Skip to main content

The impact of science on society: Bertrand Russell's analysis

"Knowledge is power, but it is power for evil as much as for good. It follows that, unless men increase in wisdom as much as in knowledge, increase of knowledge will be increase of sorrow" 



These are the words of Bertrand Russell. A British polymath, logician, mathematician, antiwar activist, philosopher, and an author. He has been called "the father of logic" by many and there's no doubt that he is. I'm taking you to one of his most famous works; the impact of science on society.



About the book: 
The book consists of lectures delivered by him on many occasions. Almost all of these lectures were delivered after world war 2. The idea of this book revolves around both positive and negative impacts that science created on society. Also, what can still happen in future. How can mankind use science to move towards prosperity or deterioration. It gives a clear insight on scientific democracy and dictatorship. Russell's philosophy involves rationality and truth. His writing style is ironic which makes him misunderstood by many but I got many heartfelt laughters while reading this book.

My thoughts about the book:
On the positive side of the band, there was a clear picture of how observation should have priority over authority, how human mind should observe the truth and should not accept anything without questioning it. That's exactly how science destroyed the traditions. It states  how science enabled us to  fight diseases, famines, droughts, infant mortality and much more. The book totally  destroys the idea of a perfect, secure world. Russell argues that the world should allow peaceful adventure because the need for adventure is ingrained in our minds. It talks about art to be free of authority in order to express the truth.

On the negative side, it shows us how people who moved towards scientific dictatorship had the power to make it evil. How weapons were constructed to cause destruction. At the end he talks about "Us" deteriorating the planet. Using all the raw materials  and pushing it towards destruction. Even if in future science replaceces these raw materials and resources with new inventions, the growing population will always be a hurdle in order to sustain the planet. 

As a solution he argues that there should be a world government to make sure of peace and food availability. Which he later states as "impractical". The journey he argues is long but there is no reason for human kind to lose hope. 
I've never read a visionary like him, so go on and get your vision of the possible future. It will help you learn how to question things instead of blindly following. Either its religion, or any other ideology. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You, me and Microplastics

Microplastics (MPs) are the hottest topic now a days and they should be because they are everywhere and by everywhere I mean EVERYWHERE. The oceans, the Islands, the lakes, the sediments, inside the organisms and even in human blood too. before we go further lets see What are they?  There is no agreed upon definition of Mps in scientific literature but some scientists define them as tiny plastic particles with a size range between 1μm-5mm. They can be of different shapes and colors (transparent as well)  and are released into the environment directly or indirectly. Directly through washing machines, industries and personal care products (watch your glitter use, folks) while Indirect exposure means the breakdown of larger plastic pieces into smaller ones (how? a topic for another day). Why Worry?  Mps are a pollutant of emerging concern for multiple reasons.  They are everywhere  They are a threat to ecological health  Small organisms eat them and they ...